Skip to content
China Patent Strategy

Latest Updates on the IP Landscape in China

  • Eagle IP
  • About Our Contributors
  • Eagle IP
  • About Our Contributors
  • China,  China Patent Office,  CNIPA,  data,  Invalidation,  Patent,  Patent Law,  Patent Re-examination Board,  Patentability,  Pharma,  Support Requirements

    How to Protect a Crystal Form (Polymorph) Patent in China

    June 3, 2025

    Crystalline forms are critical to pharmaceutical patents, offering extended protection for improved stability, bioavailability, or manufacturability. However, securing such patents in China has grown increasingly difficult due to the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA)’s strict patentability criteria. Unlike the U.S. or Europe, where structural novelty or problem-solving utility may suffice, China demands quantifiable evidence of superiority over prior art forms and rejects patents based on routine screening alone. Recent decisions, like the invalidation of fruquintinib Crystal Form I, highlight common pitfalls: insufficient comparative data, incremental technical effects, and failures to preempt obviousness challenges. With China’s pharmaceutical market surging and secondary patents under heightened scrutiny, companies must strategically align their IP strategies…

    Read More
    eagleip No Comments

    Related Posts

    New Policies to Promote Importation of Innovative Drugs

    November 8, 2018

    Foreign companies transferring IP out of China: things to know

    October 25, 2018

    Is it Sufficient to Claim an Antibody only by Describing its Antigen?

    November 12, 2018
  • China,  China Patent Office,  CNIPA,  Court Cases,  Courts,  Pharma

    Beijing IP Court Reverses CNIPA Decision and Upholds Ozempic® semaglutide patent in China as VALID based on Novo Nordisk’s Post Filing Data

    June 27, 2024

    Recently, all eyes have been on China as the fundamental patent covering semaglutide, the active ingredient in Ozempic® and Wegovy®, will expire on March 20, 2026. It goes without saying that generics are ramping up bigtime in China (and also around the world), preparing to manufacture and sell this blockbuster drug to one of the biggest markets in the world. Any shortening of the patent term for this key semaglutide patent in China could cause an immediately shift in the Chinese Ozempic market (not to mention directly impacting Novo Nordisk). Novo Nordisk’s Semaglutide Patent in China On September 5, 2022, the China National Intellectual Property Association (China’s patent administrative office,…

    Read More
    eagleip No Comments

    Related Posts

    New Policies to Promote Importation of Innovative Drugs

    November 8, 2018

    Foreign companies transferring IP out of China: things to know

    October 25, 2018

    Is it Sufficient to Claim an Antibody only by Describing its Antigen?

    November 12, 2018
  • China,  China Patent Office,  CNIPA,  Court Cases,  Courts,  Invalidation,  Inventions,  Patent Law,  Pharma,  Top 10 IP Case

    Do Promotional Marketing Materials Constitute an “Offer for Sale” under Chinese Patent Law? Bayer IP GmbH v. Nanjing Hang Seng Pharmaceutical

    December 12, 2023

    Bayer’s blockbuster drug Rivaroxaban has seen its share of patent litigations in China, several of which are big enough to be listed as Top 10 IP cases or 50 Representative IP cases. We summarized an invalidation case back in 2020 where all of Bayer’s claims directed towards the compound were upheld. Recently, another Rivaroxaban case made it onto China’s 50 Representative IP cases in 2022, this time in a final judgement from the Supreme Court of an infringement case against a generic company who was marketing the patented drug before the patent expiration date. At the heart of the case is a dispute over (1) what acts by a generic…

    Read More
    eagleip No Comments

    Related Posts

    New Policies to Promote Importation of Innovative Drugs

    November 8, 2018

    Foreign companies transferring IP out of China: things to know

    October 25, 2018

    Is it Sufficient to Claim an Antibody only by Describing its Antigen?

    November 12, 2018
 Older Posts

Subscribe!

Don't miss a post! Subscribe here to join our mailing list. We will never share your contact information with anyone else.
Loading

Recent Posts

  • Sep 30, 2025 When Standards Evolve: How China Judges Inventiveness in Next-Gen Tech Patents
  • Sep 18, 2025 Obviousness: can features from different categories of products be combined to invalidate a design patent?
  • Sep 04, 2025 NMPA’s Releases Draft Measures for Data Protection (Data Exclusivity)
  • Jun 03, 2025 How to Protect a Crystal Form (Polymorph) Patent in China
  • May 28, 2025 Why Do Examiners Fail to Recognize the Importance of my “Parameter Features”?

Categories

Archives

  • September 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • September 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • April 2022
  • February 2022
  • December 2021
  • October 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • April 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • June 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018

Popular Posts

  • New Policies to Promote Importation of Innovative Drugs
  • Foreign companies transferring IP out of China: things to know
  • Is it Sufficient to Claim an Antibody only by Describing its Antigen?
  • Can Post Filing Data Overcome Inventive Step in China?
  • No % homology? How to craft allowable claim scope around sequences to comply with China’s strict written description requirements

Recent Posts

  • Sep 30, 2025 When Standards Evolve: How China Judges Inventiveness in Next-Gen Tech Patents
  • Sep 18, 2025 Obviousness: can features from different categories of products be combined to invalidate a design patent?
  • Sep 04, 2025 NMPA’s Releases Draft Measures for Data Protection (Data Exclusivity)
  • Jun 03, 2025 How to Protect a Crystal Form (Polymorph) Patent in China
  • May 28, 2025 Why Do Examiners Fail to Recognize the Importance of my “Parameter Features”?
  • Apr 01, 2025 Burden Shift: CNIPA Requires Applicant to “Prove” that Post-Filing Data is not Fake Data
  • Mar 10, 2025 RNAi Patent Success in China: Overcoming “Comprising” Claim Challenges
  • Feb 04, 2025 Can I transfer priority rights in China without the consent of other applicants? Insights from the Broad Institute’s CRISPR patent
  • Jan 09, 2025 AI is magical but NOT magic! Be specific in your AI patents!
  • Dec 04, 2024 How a Secondhand Ground Brush Wiped Away a Chinese Patent
© 2025 Eagle IP Limited
Savona Theme by Optima Themes