Skip to content
China Patent Strategy

Latest Updates on the IP Landscape in China

  • Eagle IP
  • About Our Contributors
  • Eagle IP
  • About Our Contributors
Link 1

New! 4th Amendment of the Patent Law

Link 2

New Policies to Promote Importation of Innovative Drugs

Link 3

Post Filing Data for Chemical Compounds

  • China,  China Patent Office,  CNIPA,  Invalidation,  Patent Re-examination and Invalidation Department

    What Microsoft’s Recent Patent Invalidation Case in China Teaches Us About User Interface Patents

    January 29, 2026

    Each year the CNIPA publishes its Top Ten Patent Re-examination and Invalidation Cases for the previous year. These cases are meant to be guiding cases, showcasing exemplary real-world decisions that clarify certain aspects of the law. Today we’ll be sharing about one of the Top 10 Invalidation Cases in 2024 involving Microsoft (China) Co., Ltd. petitioning to invalidate a patent by Newman Infinite Inc. in the field of human-computer interaction (HCI). Case summary The patent claimed methods and devices for manipulating a touch screen user interface that could help differentiate between various touch targets, preventing undesired interactions with non-target elements. The patentee used a self-defined term “clutch user interface element”,…

    Read More
    eagleip No Comments

    Related Posts

    New Policies to Promote Importation of Innovative Drugs

    November 8, 2018

    Foreign companies transferring IP out of China: things to know

    October 25, 2018

    Is it Sufficient to Claim an Antibody only by Describing its Antigen?

    November 12, 2018
  • A chemical structure with letters and numbers Description automatically generated
    China,  China Patent Office,  CNIPA,  Court Cases,  Courts,  Pharma

    Beijing Supreme People’s Court Upholds Novo Nordisk Semaglutide Patent in China based on Post-Filing Data

    January 23, 2026

    On December 31, 2025, The Supreme People’s Court upheld the Beijing IP Court’s decision, meaning that the semaglutide patent remains valid and will expire on March 20, 2026. Novo Nordisk announced this positive news via a press release on the day the case was decided. The Chinese Ministry of Commerce has also confirmed this decision on their website. This case is certainly positive news for those in the biopharmaceutical industry thinking of developing their drugs in China. Additionally, if you’ve been following this case, you’ll know that the validity of the patent came down to whether the Court would accept post-filing data demonstrating semaglutide’s surprising pharmacokinetic effects in animal models.…

    Read More
    eagleip No Comments

    Related Posts

    New Policies to Promote Importation of Innovative Drugs

    November 8, 2018

    Foreign companies transferring IP out of China: things to know

    October 25, 2018

    Is it Sufficient to Claim an Antibody only by Describing its Antigen?

    November 12, 2018
  • China,  China Patent Office,  CNIPA,  Inventions,  Patent

    Thin Disclosure but “Bulletproof” Protection: How a Salt Form Patent was Upheld in China Despite Minimal Data

    January 7, 2026

    In China, innovative drug companies typically rely on their initial composition of matter patents to block out competitors. Other “follow-on” IP, such as those directed towards formulations, polymorphs, and salt forms, are often regarded as less likely to survive invalidation challenges, especially in China where the standard of “person skilled in the art” is so high. Having said that, we share below today a positive counter example case in which a salt form of a JAK inhibitor survived invalidation. This case is one of CNIPA’s Top Ten Patent Re-examination and Invalidation Cases for 2024 (published in the 2025 list). These cases are meant to be guiding cases, showcasing exemplary real-world…

    Read More
    eagleip No Comments

    Related Posts

    New Policies to Promote Importation of Innovative Drugs

    November 8, 2018

    Foreign companies transferring IP out of China: things to know

    October 25, 2018

    Is it Sufficient to Claim an Antibody only by Describing its Antigen?

    November 12, 2018
 Older Posts

Subscribe!

Don't miss a post! Subscribe here to join our mailing list. We will never share your contact information with anyone else.
Loading

Recent Posts

  • Jan 29, 2026 What Microsoft’s Recent Patent Invalidation Case in China Teaches Us About User Interface Patents
  • Jan 23, 2026 Beijing Supreme People’s Court Upholds Novo Nordisk Semaglutide Patent in China based on Post-Filing Data
  • Jan 07, 2026 Thin Disclosure but “Bulletproof” Protection: How a Salt Form Patent was Upheld in China Despite Minimal Data
  • Nov 13, 2025 The Secret Prior Art Trap: A Case Study on Conflicting Applications in China
  • Oct 21, 2025 From Faces to Football Fields: How Applying AI Models to Different Application Fields Can Prove Inventive in China

Categories

Archives

  • January 2026
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • September 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • April 2022
  • February 2022
  • December 2021
  • October 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • April 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • June 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018

Popular Posts

  • New Policies to Promote Importation of Innovative Drugs
  • Foreign companies transferring IP out of China: things to know
  • Is it Sufficient to Claim an Antibody only by Describing its Antigen?
  • Can Post Filing Data Overcome Inventive Step in China?
  • No % homology? How to craft allowable claim scope around sequences to comply with China’s strict written description requirements

Recent Posts

  • Jan 29, 2026 What Microsoft’s Recent Patent Invalidation Case in China Teaches Us About User Interface Patents
  • Jan 23, 2026 Beijing Supreme People’s Court Upholds Novo Nordisk Semaglutide Patent in China based on Post-Filing Data
  • Jan 07, 2026 Thin Disclosure but “Bulletproof” Protection: How a Salt Form Patent was Upheld in China Despite Minimal Data
  • Nov 13, 2025 The Secret Prior Art Trap: A Case Study on Conflicting Applications in China
  • Oct 21, 2025 From Faces to Football Fields: How Applying AI Models to Different Application Fields Can Prove Inventive in China
  • Sep 30, 2025 When Standards Evolve: How China Judges Inventiveness in Next-Gen Tech Patents
  • Sep 18, 2025 Obviousness: can features from different categories of products be combined to invalidate a design patent?
  • Sep 04, 2025 NMPA’s Releases Draft Measures for Data Protection (Data Exclusivity)
  • Jun 03, 2025 How to Protect a Crystal Form (Polymorph) Patent in China
  • May 28, 2025 Why Do Examiners Fail to Recognize the Importance of my “Parameter Features”?
© 2026 Eagle IP Limited
Savona Theme by Optima Themes