Skip to content
China Patent Strategy

Latest Updates on the IP Landscape in China

  • Eagle IP
  • About Our Contributors
  • Eagle IP
  • About Our Contributors
Link 1

New! 4th Amendment of the Patent Law

Link 2

New Policies to Promote Importation of Innovative Drugs

Link 3

Post Filing Data for Chemical Compounds

  • China Patent Office,  CNIPA,  Inventions,  Post-Filing Data

    Burden Shift: CNIPA Requires Applicant to “Prove” that Post-Filing Data is not Fake Data

    April 1, 2025

    “Good Faith” is a challenging concept that brings with it the nuances of a particular jurisdiction’s ideas about honesty, moral values, and societal expectations. Most patent laws around the world include good faith requirements – especially in matters involving the legal and the medical profession – and China is no exception. So what’s the standard? This case demonstrates one example of how stark inconsistencies between post-filing (clinical trial) data and publicly available information led the CNIPA to reject a case because of false post-filing data submitted in violation of the “good faith” requirement. Case Background The disputed patent application, titled “A Type of Tini-Class Small Molecule Compound and Its Preparation…

    Read More
    eagleip No Comments

    Related Posts

    BREAKING NEWS: New Pilot Program for Hong Kong Applicants to get Accelerated Patent Examination in the Chinese Patent Office Starting January 1, 2023

    January 4, 2023

    First Ever Successful Invalidation Challenge Due to Unauthorized Foreign Filing

    March 8, 2023

    Foreigners Beware: China Proposes Requiring IP Made Using Exported Chinese Genetic Resources to be Co-Owned by Chinese Collaborators

    March 22, 2023
  • China,  China Patent Office,  CNIPA,  Invalidation,  Inventions,  Patent Law

    RNAi Patent Success in China: Overcoming “Comprising” Claim Challenges

    March 10, 2025

    An Update on Sufficiency and Inventiveness of RNAi Patents in China RNAi is a fast-developing technology that has gained traction in the pharmaceutical industry as a promising therapeutic agent. It is important to follow closely RNAi patent proceedings to learn how different examination boards and courts understand and handle these new technologies. The first-ever invalidation decision in China for an RNAi patent1 was rendered in 2022 by the Patent Re-examination Board (the “Board”). We previously wrote about this case, which discussed the standards for post-filing data, sufficiency, and inventive step, particularly for RNAi inventions. Since then, two newer cases involving RNAi have also been upheld by the Board after facing similar…

    Read More
    eagleip No Comments

    Related Posts

    New Policies to Promote Importation of Innovative Drugs

    November 8, 2018

    Foreign companies transferring IP out of China: things to know

    October 25, 2018

    Is it Sufficient to Claim an Antibody only by Describing its Antigen?

    November 12, 2018
  • Biotech,  China,  China Patent Office,  CNIPA,  Inventions,  national phase entry application,  Patent,  Patent Re-examination and Invalidation Department,  PCT,  PRD,  Priority

    Can I transfer priority rights in China without the consent of other applicants? Insights from the Broad Institute’s CRISPR patent

    February 4, 2025

    The high-profile disputes surrounding an important CRISPR patent belonging to The Broad Institute, MIT and Harvard (hereinafter “the proprietors”) has attracted a lot of attention in recent years, particularly regarding the validity of priority rights that were challenged worldwide. In Europe, the patent was famously revoked by the European Patent Office (hereinafter “EPO”) due to an invalid priority claim1, though recent decisions by EPO suggest a dramatic shift in EPO’s approach that may lead to a different outcome2. Today, we will discuss the decision of the Chinese National Intellectual Property Administration (hereinafter “CNIPA”) in determining whether the proprietors’ priority claims in their CRISPR patent in China were valid, given discrepancies…

    Read More
    eagleip No Comments

    Related Posts

    Is it Sufficient to Claim an Antibody only by Describing its Antigen?

    November 12, 2018

    No % homology? How to craft allowable claim scope around sequences to comply with China’s strict written description requirements

    November 23, 2018

    Diagnostic Claims in China

    January 9, 2020
 Older Posts

Subscribe!

Don't miss a post! Subscribe here to join our mailing list. We will never share your contact information with anyone else.
Loading

Recent Posts

  • Apr 01, 2025 Burden Shift: CNIPA Requires Applicant to “Prove” that Post-Filing Data is not Fake Data
  • Mar 10, 2025 RNAi Patent Success in China: Overcoming “Comprising” Claim Challenges
  • Feb 04, 2025 Can I transfer priority rights in China without the consent of other applicants? Insights from the Broad Institute’s CRISPR patent
  • Jan 09, 2025 AI is magical but NOT magic! Be specific in your AI patents!
  • Dec 04, 2024 How a Secondhand Ground Brush Wiped Away a Chinese Patent

Categories

Archives

  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • September 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • April 2022
  • February 2022
  • December 2021
  • October 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • April 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • June 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018

Recent Posts

  • Apr 01, 2025 Burden Shift: CNIPA Requires Applicant to “Prove” that Post-Filing Data is not Fake Data
  • Mar 10, 2025 RNAi Patent Success in China: Overcoming “Comprising” Claim Challenges
  • Feb 04, 2025 Can I transfer priority rights in China without the consent of other applicants? Insights from the Broad Institute’s CRISPR patent
  • Jan 09, 2025 AI is magical but NOT magic! Be specific in your AI patents!
  • Dec 04, 2024 How a Secondhand Ground Brush Wiped Away a Chinese Patent
  • Sep 06, 2024 New Fee Standards Released for Chinese Patent Applications
  • Jun 27, 2024 Beijing IP Court Reverses CNIPA Decision and Upholds Ozempic® semaglutide patent in China as VALID based on Novo Nordisk’s Post Filing Data
  • Jun 17, 2024 A More Detailed Overview of China’s Patent Term Extension (PTE) System
  • May 07, 2024 Everything you need to know about Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) in China
  • Apr 23, 2024 Stay Ahead: Getting a Chinese Patent in Three Months?
© 2025 Eagle IP Limited
Savona Theme by Optima Themes