On December 31, 2025, The Supreme People’s Court upheld the Beijing IP Court’s decision, meaning that the semaglutide patent remains valid and will expire on March 20, 2026. Novo Nordisk announced this positive news via a press release on the day the case was decided. The Chinese Ministry of Commerce has also confirmed this decision on their website. This case is certainly positive news for those in the biopharmaceutical industry thinking of developing their drugs in China. Additionally, if you’ve been following this case, you’ll know that the validity of the patent came down to whether the Court would accept post-filing data demonstrating semaglutide’s surprising pharmacokinetic effects in animal models.…
-
-
Thin Disclosure but “Bulletproof” Protection: How a Salt Form Patent was Upheld in China Despite Minimal Data
In China, innovative drug companies typically rely on their initial composition of matter patents to block out competitors. Other “follow-on” IP, such as those directed towards formulations, polymorphs, and salt forms, are often regarded as less likely to survive invalidation challenges, especially in China where the standard of “person skilled in the art” is so high. Having said that, we share below today a positive counter example case in which a salt form of a JAK inhibitor survived invalidation. This case is one of CNIPA’s Top Ten Patent Re-examination and Invalidation Cases for 2024 (published in the 2025 list). These cases are meant to be guiding cases, showcasing exemplary real-world…
- China, China Patent Office, CNIPA, Conflicting Application, Patent, Patent Re-examination and Invalidation Department
The Secret Prior Art Trap: A Case Study on Conflicting Applications in China
In patent prosecution, the concept of a “conflicting application” or “secret prior art” plays a critical role in determining the patentability of an invention. This article explores the framework for assessing conflicting applications under Chinese patent law, with a comparative perspective on the approaches adopted in the United States. Case Background: The Image Encoding Dispute The subject of the appeal was a patent application for an image encoding technology, filed on June 5, 2019. The applicant had not claimed any priority. The CNIPA Examiner had issued a Final Rejection, asserting that the application lacked novelty in light of two prior PCT international applications: The applicant appealed this decision, leading to…
