Skip to content
China Patent Strategy

Latest Updates on the IP Landscape in China

  • Eagle IP
  • About Our Contributors
  • Eagle IP
  • About Our Contributors
  • China,  China Patent Office,  Data Exclusivity,  NMPA

    NMPA’s Releases Draft Measures for Data Protection (Data Exclusivity)

    September 4, 2025

    In March 2025, China’s National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) released yet another set of draft implementation measures on data protection.1 Key highlights of these new measures include the following: A Bit of History China’s journey toward a comprehensive pharmaceutical data protection framework has been ongoing for over two decades, a roller coaster ride from its initial commitments upon joining the World Trade Organization (WTO) to its most recent draft regulations. WTO Accession (2001) and Early Provisions (2002) When China joined the WTO in 2001, it signed the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). In line with its WTO obligations, China incorporated data exclusivity into its domestic law…

    Read More
    eagleip No Comments

    Related Posts

    New Policies to Promote Importation of Innovative Drugs

    November 8, 2018

    Foreign companies transferring IP out of China: things to know

    October 25, 2018

    Is it Sufficient to Claim an Antibody only by Describing its Antigen?

    November 12, 2018
  • China,  China Patent Office,  CNIPA,  data,  Invalidation,  Patent,  Patent Law,  Patent Re-examination Board,  Patentability,  Pharma,  Support Requirements

    How to Protect a Crystal Form (Polymorph) Patent in China

    June 3, 2025

    Crystalline forms are critical to pharmaceutical patents, offering extended protection for improved stability, bioavailability, or manufacturability. However, securing such patents in China has grown increasingly difficult due to the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA)’s strict patentability criteria. Unlike the U.S. or Europe, where structural novelty or problem-solving utility may suffice, China demands quantifiable evidence of superiority over prior art forms and rejects patents based on routine screening alone. Recent decisions, like the invalidation of fruquintinib Crystal Form I, highlight common pitfalls: insufficient comparative data, incremental technical effects, and failures to preempt obviousness challenges. With China’s pharmaceutical market surging and secondary patents under heightened scrutiny, companies must strategically align their IP strategies…

    Read More
    eagleip No Comments

    Related Posts

    New Policies to Promote Importation of Innovative Drugs

    November 8, 2018

    Foreign companies transferring IP out of China: things to know

    October 25, 2018

    Is it Sufficient to Claim an Antibody only by Describing its Antigen?

    November 12, 2018
  • China,  China Patent Office,  CNIPA,  Key decisions,  parameter feature,  Patent,  patent application,  Patent Law

    Why Do Examiners Fail to Recognize the Importance of my “Parameter Features”?

    May 28, 2025

    The Impact of Parameter Features on Inventiveness ”Parameter features” – numerical or mathematical expressions that define the quantity or physical properties of a subject – frequently appear as technical features within a claim. Often described as numerical ranges or measurements, they frequently play a critical role in addressing technical problems. However, in practice, Examiners and courts often disregard or devalue the inventive contribution of these “parameter features”, leading to considerable confusion among inventors. Recently, the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) released the 2023 Compilation of Key Decisions in Patent Reexamination and Invalidation Cases. Among the cases discussed, two decisions (Cases No. 24 and 25) provide valuable insights into how…

    Read More
    eagleip No Comments

    Related Posts

    New Policies to Promote Importation of Innovative Drugs

    November 8, 2018

    Foreign companies transferring IP out of China: things to know

    October 25, 2018

    Is it Sufficient to Claim an Antibody only by Describing its Antigen?

    November 12, 2018
 Older Posts
Newer Posts 

Subscribe!

Don't miss a post! Subscribe here to join our mailing list. We will never share your contact information with anyone else.
Loading

Recent Posts

  • Jun 25, 2026 No More Hindsight Bias: China’s Supreme People’s Court Reins in Patent Inventiveness Assessments
  • Jun 01, 2026 IP Update: China’s Supreme People’s Court Issues First Public Decision Defining China’s Inventorship Standard
  • May 22, 2026 Breaking: China Released Drug Trial Data Protection Implementation Measures
  • Apr 13, 2026 Please “Mind the Traps”: Four Common Misconceptions About Hong Kong Patents
  • Feb 27, 2026 A Stratification Too Far? How the CNIPA Draws the Line on Patient Subgroups in a Recent Precision Medicine Invalidation Case

Categories

Archives

  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • September 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • April 2022
  • February 2022
  • December 2021
  • October 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • April 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • June 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018

Popular Posts

  • New Policies to Promote Importation of Innovative Drugs
  • Foreign companies transferring IP out of China: things to know
  • Is it Sufficient to Claim an Antibody only by Describing its Antigen?
  • Can Post Filing Data Overcome Inventive Step in China?
  • No % homology? How to craft allowable claim scope around sequences to comply with China’s strict written description requirements

Recent Posts

  • Jun 25, 2026 No More Hindsight Bias: China’s Supreme People’s Court Reins in Patent Inventiveness Assessments
  • Jun 01, 2026 IP Update: China’s Supreme People’s Court Issues First Public Decision Defining China’s Inventorship Standard
  • May 22, 2026 Breaking: China Released Drug Trial Data Protection Implementation Measures
  • Apr 13, 2026 Please “Mind the Traps”: Four Common Misconceptions About Hong Kong Patents
  • Feb 27, 2026 A Stratification Too Far? How the CNIPA Draws the Line on Patient Subgroups in a Recent Precision Medicine Invalidation Case
  • Jan 29, 2026 What Microsoft’s Recent Patent Invalidation Case in China Teaches Us About User Interface Patents
  • Jan 23, 2026 Beijing Supreme People’s Court Upholds Novo Nordisk Semaglutide Patent in China based on Post-Filing Data
  • Jan 07, 2026 Thin Disclosure but “Bulletproof” Protection: How a Salt Form Patent was Upheld in China Despite Minimal Data
  • Nov 13, 2025 The Secret Prior Art Trap: A Case Study on Conflicting Applications in China
  • Oct 21, 2025 From Faces to Football Fields: How Applying AI Models to Different Application Fields Can Prove Inventive in China
© 2026 Eagle IP Limited
Savona Theme by Optima Themes